http://www.diariosigloxxi.com/texto-ep/mostrar/20090420161920
The non-TVE Rosa Díez.
I have several questions for Rosa Díez, but either I do it personally or I will be disappointed. TVE has decided to invite is the program in future editions to the leaders of Convergence, IU and ERC. Absent by choice, the PNV, which is no friend to these whims and even less with what he has gone for above-and others will UPyD Rosa Díez. Naturally TVE has a convincing explanation, but tortuous, are invited to parties more representation in parliament, but in this democracy our number of seats is not proportionate to the number of votes and Ezquerra Republicana, for example, to enter TVE studies with honors supported by 291,532 votes while he voted Rosa Díez English 306,078. Let me explain what the "tortuous", which sounds good but may seem exaggerated. RAE defines it as "unfair, or not according to law or reason." However, his absence is unfair according to the number of votes and the laws of reason, even the weird laws of pure reason, would advise include television in a room for this woman, you fall right or wrong-has a voice own, connect to the street, creating a party of nothing as outrageous and over: not only catch seat in Congress, but farm in the Vitoria. For all these reasons, it is obvious that Rosa Díez would be the fourth invited to the program or, rather, three for the second batch. Of course this statement, if we conspiracy and serious, it could be just the contrary: it has its own voice, because it connects with the street, because it has won seats etc * Rosa Díez is obvious that he ought not to be in a program like that. Is not it convenient for whom? But I believe everyone: the PSOE because she is a socialist and it hurts to hear certain truths, the PP because their rational discourse in policy may take away votes on other issues but is radically contrary to the tenets of Genoa to CIU because if anything characterizes the policy of Rosa Díez is that nationalism should be treated with respect but without delivery ominous; IU and because, at this point, I think they see enemies everywhere. Rosa Díez and its people are a pain in the consolidated democracy rather than stagnant, complacent and tolerant than you already know all and do not like dissent. Go it is priced very high in this country and in many areas, which is paying UPyD even private loans that top returns. A party that lives by its members and supporters, always a danger because it brings out the resto.Y as if this were not enough, the polls are favorable. Nor that the Reform Party Rock, or any other attempt to be born from scratch, have failed. "Citizens" worked in Catalonia and are already half split. Lo UPyD is something to consider and perhaps why, with the legal cover but unfair to have no seats and votes, TVE president of his presence. I think it is wrong even from the point of view of the audience, between what we can say for now the unknown to the vast majority of IU's new leader and the speech of Rosa Díez, no color. And on top of the ERC do not have to don Josep-Lluis-here-and-en-la China Popular the thing down a lot. They know why they do, the only other suspect.
0 comments:
Post a Comment